Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journalists for Human Rights
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 01:51, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Journalists for Human Rights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional, non-notable, almost entirely self-sourced. Wellington Bay (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Organizations, and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 12:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Alexthegod5 (talk) 15:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Article needs work. Suggest deal with by adding appropriate tags.ash (talk) 08:02, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's been tagged as "promotional" for 9 years. Wellington Bay (talk) 13:07, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- I understand but that doesn't make the organisation less notable and AfD isn't supposed to be a process for improving an article. ash (talk) 02:34, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Btw: I've revised the article and removed the promotional tag. ash (talk) 02:41, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- It "that doesn't make the organisation less notable", what does make the organisation notable? Geschichte (talk) 13:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's been tagged as "promotional" for 9 years. Wellington Bay (talk) 13:07, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.